Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and Peoples Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place off attachment into the people mating. Breakdown of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Diary away from Social Facts, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites contradiction: A personal technical one reduces public engagement and you can mental well-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Number, timing, and time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent Population Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study out of closeness, appeal, and you will commitment: Evaluation the brand new presumptions of your own triangular theory off like. Mental Account, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact finest throughout the performing worse: Personal reviews in this personal relationship. Record from Identification and you will Social Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit cognition from close competition. Log of Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
An effective. (2001)mitment and you may dating restoration systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to attractive selection: The progressed therapy regarding relationships maintenance. Progression and you can People Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential research out of argument and you may accord in upset and nondistressed relationship lovers. Journal out of Asking and you may Logical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship development on the web: What’s the large interest? Journal out-of Personal Activities, 58(1), 9–30.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and also the design from pleasure in personal matchmaking
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research aim in romantic matchmaking: A style of worldwide improvement and you may certain verification. Inside the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents regarding examination of pair correspondence (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-specialist thread through the contact lens of connection concept. Psychotherapy: Idea, Look, Behavior, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh social keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitivity so you’re able to personal cues because a transformative a reaction to personal exception. In K. D. Williams, J. https://getbride.org/da/peruanske-kvinder/ P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), New societal outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Globally and you may particular relational activities on exposure to social relations. Diary away from Personality and Public Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can pointers seeking to from inside the intimate matchmaking. Personality and Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular connection representations from inside the adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Diary From Personal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationship: Restoration and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection directly feeling certainly one of spouses just like the a purpose of brand new resemblance in their common skills. Personality And you will Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out of extrinsic advantages to your preference and you can loving. Journal from Identification and you will Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
